Sierra Nevada “Clone”, Side by Side


So, I had the chance to try my Sierra Nevada Pale Ale clone side by side with a friend at the weekend. The image at the top, while not the best photo in the world, shows the homebrew version on the left.

I should point out that I bought my bottle of SNPA from the largest supermarket in the UK. It seems to be that whenever I buy a bottle from said supermarket, it doesn’t seem to be particularly fresh, even though it is well within date. Could it be they are storing them warm, or they are just sitting on the shelf for a long time?

Appearance wise, the homebrew version is a few shades darker. Not a million miles off, but easily noticeable. Both had a slight yeast haze, perhaps a little chill haze. Head retention and lacing were good on both, slightly better on the homebrew version.

Aroma, this was probably the most surprising part for me. Neither had the big Cascade, lychee aroma I know and expect from this beer. My beer did have this aroma about two weeks ago, but it has rapidly faded since. The commercial version had a malty aroma, more than anything; like a freshly milled sack of pilsner malt. The homebrew version had a slight rose-like, alcohol aroma (phenylethanol?), along with a slight grassiness.

Flavour, I was delighted that the two beers matched up very well here. The commercial beer had a slightly cleaner, lager-like character, while the homebrew version had more of the rose-like alcohol along with a slight alcohol warmth. Both had a similar, Cascade hop flavour, and both finished with the same amount of bitterness. Also, the homebrew version had more caramel/toffee. The mouthfeel was very similar, however the commercial version had slightly more carbonation.

Overall, I am pleased with my first proper attempt at recreating this great beer. I have a couple of changes I want to make:

  • Use less 120 EBC crystal in the next attempt. I will either half this or replace it completely with a lighter crystal.
  • Alter the fermentation peramaters.  I was very surprised to find some higher alcohols in my version despite pitching a large amount of yeast and keeping the ferment temperature at a strict 19C. I will switch to a smaller batch size next time, perhaps pitch the liquid Chico yeast instead of the dried version, and build up a large starter. I will also note the pitching temperature and the amount of oxygen I use. The commercial beer had a clean lager-like character while mine was much more like an ale.

Oh yeah. I think this beer went great with Surf ‘n’ Turf. We have here some peppered steak, scallops, calzone, asparagus and corn on the cob. Delicious!



  1. leigh · September 29, 2009

    nice – the beer looks nice and your points in respect of taste ar interesting. I still cant decide wether to clone this myself, with it being my favourite beer of all time. I dont want to pull it from its pedestal!! that surf and turf looks good, too!

  2. Bailey · October 18, 2009

    Looks great. Wonder where your hop aroma went inbetween bottling and drinking? Something to do with being chilled?

    • Geoff · November 5, 2009

      It’s just one of those things I think you have to accept if you serve draught beer, if you’re not dry hopping, hop aroma just doesn’t linger around for more than around a month to 5 weeks in my experience. Bottled beer seems to hold it slightly better. Although, even that bottle of SNPA we tried had virtually no hop aroma.

  3. Matt · February 7, 2010

    Sounds like a pretty solid clone effot.

    The food looks even better though! 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s